21:41:43 <maxfan8> JAA: What I'm suggesting is that *anybody* who has typed a single message (and was not banned, ofc) would be allowed to vote
21:41:52 <JAA> (From #archivebot)
21:42:02 <JAA> maxfan8: Please read through the summary linked in the topic.
21:43:39 <jodizzle> Hm, I've been meaning to lay down my claims on the "lines of battle".  Maybe I'll do that this weekend.
21:43:49 <JAA> Yeah, same.
21:48:03 <jodizzle> I don't think it's been discussed much directly, but one of the really important reasons for having a decision making system in place is to decide how to spend the Open Collective money.
21:48:15 <jodizzle> I mean there are other accountability issues there as well, probably, but it would be nice to tap into
22:04:07 <t3> I will try to keep up with this discussion soon.
22:09:10 <maxfan8> JAA: If you set the supermajority threshold fairly high, you could reasonably claim that you have a consensus.
22:12:15 <maxfan8> jodizzle: I'm a big fan of RONR (actually have a copy sitting right next to me), but I'm uncertain if IRC is conducive to RONR
22:13:00 <maxfan8> Another problem with RONR (from my view) is that it *isn't* open source/freely available!
22:15:08 <maxfan8> JAA: Does anybody actually oppose moving to hackint? An unamious vote may be another option if nobody actually opposes.
22:17:40 <JAA> maxfan8: The whole "do we move to hackint" discussion has been postponed until we have a process to hold that discussion and vote. So I don't know.
22:22:26 <maxfan8> Ok, it doesn't seem like there has been any discussion as to whether any vote should be by secret ballot or public voice vote (I didn't see it in the quorum summary)
22:23:44 <maxfan8> The downside to secret ballot is that people will not be to understand why somebody is voting a particular way